Solutions

Company

Resources

Blog

Contact

Login

    • Assurance

      Smart Contract Assessment

      Securing code integrity, protecting digital assets

      Blockchain Layer 1 Assessment

      Assessing protocols, securing blockchain foundations

      Code Security Audit

      Uncovering flaws, strengthening software integrity

      Web Application Penetration Testing

      Exposing weaknesses, fortifying digital defenses

      Cloud Infrastructure Penetration Testing

      Securing configurations, protecting critical environments

      Red Team Exercise

      Simulating real-world attacks, strengthening defenses

      AI Red Teaming

      Testing AI systems against real threats

      AI Security Assessment

      Securing AI models, data, and pipelines

    • Advisory

      AI Advisory

      Guiding secure, strategic AI adoption forward

      Risk Assessment

      From unknown threats to actionable insights

      Blockchain Architecture Assessment

      Optimizing architecture for tomorrow’s networks

      Compliance Readiness

      Stay ready as regulations evolve

      Custody and Key Management Assessment

      Securing the heart of digital custody

      Technical Due Diligence

      See the risks before you invest

      Technical Training

      Empower your teams to secure what matters

    • Who We Are

      The best security engineers in the world

      Careers

      Work with the elite

      Who Trusts Us

      The trusted security advisor for blockchain and financial services industries

      Brand

      Access official logos, fonts, and guidelines

      Service Commitments

      Committed to Protecting Your Data

    • Audits

      In-depth evaluations of smart contracts and blockchain infrastructures

      BVSS

      Blockchain Vulnerability Scoring System

      Disclosures

      All the latest vulnerabilities discovered by Halborn

      Case Studies

      How Halborn’s solutions have empowered clients to overcome security issues

      Reports

      Comprehensive reports and data

  • Blog

  • Contact

  • Login

THIS WEBSITE USES COOKIES

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you've provided to them or that they've collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website. Learn More.

STAY CURRENT WITH HALBORN

Subscribe to the monthly Halborn Digest for our top blogs and videos, major company announcements, new whitepapers, webinar and event invites, and one exclusive interview.

ADVISORY SERVICES

AI AdvisoryRisk AssessmentBlockchain Architecture AssessmentCompliance ReadinessCustody and Key Management AssessmentTechnical Due DiligenceTechnical Training

ASSURANCE SERVICES

AI Security AssessmentAI Red TeamingSmart Contract AssessmentBlockchain Layer 1 AssessmentCode Security AuditWeb Application Penetration TestingCloud Infrastructure Penetration TestingRed Team Exercise

COMPANY

Who We AreWho Trusts UsService CommitmentsCareersBrandBlogContact

RESOURCES

AuditsDisclosuresReportsBVSSCase Studies
Halborn Logo
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseVulnerability Disclosure Policy

© Halborn 2026. All rights reserved.

Background

// Security Assessment

07.01.2025 - 07.07.2025

Core V2

IP.World

Halborn logotext
← Back to Audits

Core V2 - IP.World


Prepared by:

Halborn Logo

HALBORN

Last Updated 07/25/2025

Date of Engagement: July 1st, 2025 - July 7th, 2025

Summary

100% of all REPORTED Findings have been addressed

All findings

14

Critical

1

High

1

Medium

4

Low

4

Informational

4


Table of Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Assessment summary
  • 3. Caveats
  • 4. Scope
  • 5. Findings overview

1. Introduction

IPWorld engaged Halborn to conduct a security assessment of their smart contracts starting at July 1st, 2025 and ending on July 7th, 2025. The security assessment was scoped to the smart contracts provided in the ipdotworld/core Github repository provided to Halborn. Further details can be found in the Scope section of this report.

2. Assessment Summary

Halborn was provided 5 (five) days for the engagement, and assigned one full-time security engineer to review the security of the smart contracts in scope. The engineer is a blockchain and smart contract security expert with advanced penetration testing and smart contract hacking skills, and deep knowledge of multiple blockchain protocols.


The purpose of the assessment is to:

    • Identify potential security issues within the smart contracts.

    • Ensure that smart contract functionality operates as intended.


In summary, Halborn identified some improvements to reduce the likelihood and impact of risks, which were mostly addressed by the IPWorld team. The main ones were the following: 

    • Initialize nextTick prior to entering the harvest loop to prevent startTick corruption and ensure proper fee collection.

    • Create vesting schedule immediately when prerequisites are met, independent of WETH collection to prevent permanent blocking.

    • Clamp tick bounds within repositionBidWall() to prevent TickMath reverts and harvest denial-of-service attacks.

    • Accept user-defined deadline parameters in liquidity operations to restore slippage protection against MEV attacks.

    • Rename V2 initializer to initializeV2 and protect with reinitializer(2) modifier to enable proper proxy upgrades.

    • Remove base initializers from reinitializer functions to prevent "already initialized" reverts during upgrades.

    • Use call() without gas limits for ETH transfers to ensure compatibility with smart contract wallets.

    • Add missing safety guards to claimToken() including array length validation and SafeERC20 usage.

    • Add fee-share sum validation in constructor to prevent treasury calculation underflows and harvest reverts.

3. Caveats

The Operator role has extensive control over both data and funds within the IPWorld system. Since it is assumed to be a trusted role, risks and findings specifically tied to it were not included in this report. However, Halborn strongly recommends that the IPWorld team handle all private keys, including the Operator key, with the highest level of security and operational caution.

4. SCOPE

REPOSITORY
(a) Repository: core
(b) Assessed Commit ID: 62c2f9f
(c) Items in scope:
  • src/IPworld.Sol
  • src/IPOwnerVault.sol
  • src/IPWorldManager.sol
  • src/Operator.sol
  • src/IPToken.sol
  • src/IPworld.Sol
  • src/IPOwnerVault.sol
  • src/IPWorldManager.sol
↓ Expand ↓
Out-of-Scope: Third party dependencies and economic attacks.
Remediation Commit ID:
  • 44f9255
  • e1dcfab
  • b236e63
  • 76105d4
  • 7510624
  • 216665b
  • 294bffd
  • 0dc645d
  • d7d9646
  • af05c3d
  • 0606fd3
  • 7558185
Out-of-Scope: New features/implementations after the remediation commit IDs.

5. Findings Overview

Security analysisRisk levelRemediation
Incorrect Tick-Segment Search Yields Zero-Fee HarvestsCriticalSolved - 07/10/2025
Zero-WETH Harvest & Single-Range Deployment Can Permanently Block VestingHighSolved - 07/10/2025
Extreme-Tick Bid-Wall Repositioning Can Cause harvest DoSMediumSolved - 07/12/2025
Uncallable Initializer in IPOwnerVaultMediumSolved - 07/10/2025
Repeating Base Initializers in Re-Initializer Will RevertMediumSolved - 07/10/2025
Harvest fails for old tokens without repositionBidWall() functionMediumSolved - 07/22/2025
Hard-Coded deadline Nullifies Slippage ProtectionLowSolved - 07/10/2025
Operator-Only claimToken() Is UnusedLowSolved - 07/10/2025
Fixed-Gas ETH Transfer May Revert for Smart-Contract WalletsLowSolved - 07/10/2025
Fee-Share Sum Not BoundedLowSolved - 07/10/2025
claimIp() Lacks Basic ValidationInformationalSolved - 07/23/2025
setExpectedSigner Accepts Zero AddressInformationalSolved - 07/10/2025
Unchecked Increments Could Save GasInformationalAcknowledged - 07/10/2025
TODO Markers Indicating Incomplete FeaturesInformationalSolved - 07/23/2025

Halborn strongly recommends conducting a follow-up assessment of the project either within six months or immediately following any material changes to the codebase, whichever comes first. This approach is crucial for maintaining the project’s integrity and addressing potential vulnerabilities introduced by code modifications.

Table of Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Assessment summary
  • 3. Caveats
  • 4. Scope
  • 5. Findings overview

// Download the full report

Core V2

* Use Google Chrome for best results

** Check "Background Graphics" in the print settings if needed