- Advisory
  AI Advisory
  Strategic guidance for secure AI adoption
  AI Advisory
  Strategic guidance for secure AI adoption
  Blockchain Architecture Assessment
  Reviewing blockchain designs for security and resilience
  Blockchain Architecture Assessment
  Reviewing blockchain designs for security and resilience
  Compliance Readiness
  Aligning controls to evolving regulatory mandates
  Compliance Readiness
  Aligning controls to evolving regulatory mandates
  Custody and Key Management Assessment
  Securing digital asset custody and key systems
  Custody and Key Management Assessment
  Securing digital asset custody and key systems
  Risk Assessment
  Clarity on your cybersecurity risk posture
  Risk Assessment
  Clarity on your cybersecurity risk posture
  Technical Due Diligence
  Validating security before third-party commitments
  Technical Due Diligence
  Validating security before third-party commitments
  Technical Training
  Building blockchain and security skills enterprise-wide
  Technical Training
  Building blockchain and security skills enterprise-wide
- Assurance
  AI Red Teaming
  Adversarial testing against real-world AI threats
  AI Red Teaming
  Adversarial testing against real-world AI threats
  AI Security Assessment
  Identifying vulnerabilities in AI models and pipelines
  AI Security Assessment
  Identifying vulnerabilities in AI models and pipelines
  Blockchain Layer 1 Assessment
  Protocol-level security review of L1 networks
  Blockchain Layer 1 Assessment
  Protocol-level security review of L1 networks
  Code Security Audit
  Uncovering vulnerabilities in your source code
  Code Security Audit
  Uncovering vulnerabilities in your source code
  Web Application Penetration Testing
  Exposing exploitable flaws in web applications
  Web Application Penetration Testing
  Exposing exploitable flaws in web applications
  Cloud Infrastructure Penetration Testing
  Finding weaknesses across cloud environments
  Cloud Infrastructure Penetration Testing
  Finding weaknesses across cloud environments
  Red Team Exercise
  Full-scope adversarial simulation of your defenses
  Red Team Exercise
  Full-scope adversarial simulation of your defenses
  Smart Contract Assessment
  Code security testing for blockchain-powered applications and systems.
  Smart Contract Assessment
  Code security testing for blockchain-powered applications and systems.

Token - Dappos

Prepared by:

HALBORN

Last Updated 11/12/2025

Date of Engagement: November 5th, 2025 - November 5th, 2025

Summary

No Reported Findings to Address

All findings

Critical

High

Medium

Low

Informational

1. Introduction
2. Assessment summary
3. Scope
4. Findings overview

1. Introduction

Dappos engaged Halborn to perform a security assessment of their smart contracts beginning on November 5th, 2025 and ending on November 5th, 2025. The assessment scope was limited to the smart contracts provided to Halborn. Commit hashes and additional details are available in the Scope section of this report.

The reviewed contracts contains the DAPPOS token implementation with LayerZero V2 cross-chain capabilities using the OFT (Omnichain Fungible Token) standard.

2. Assessment Summary

Halborn assigned 1 full-time security engineer to conduct a comprehensive review of the smart contracts within scope. The engineer is an expert in blockchain and smart contract security, with advanced skills in penetration testing and smart contract exploitation, as well as extensive knowledge of multiple blockchain protocols.

The objectives of this assessment were to:

Identify potential security vulnerabilities within the smart contracts.
Verify that the smart contract functionality operates as intended.

In summary, no issues were identified during the assessment of the DT codebase.

3. SCOPE

REPOSITORY

(a) Repository: DT

(b) Assessed Commit ID: 2600754

DapposToken.sol
DapposTokenAdapter.sol
DapposTokenOFT.sol

Out-of-Scope: Third-party dependencies and economic attacks.

Out-of-Scope: New features/implementations after the remediation commit IDs.

4. Findings Overview

Security analysis	Risk level	Remediation

Halborn strongly recommends conducting a follow-up assessment of the project either within six months or immediately following any material changes to the codebase, whichever comes first. This approach is crucial for maintaining the project’s integrity and addressing potential vulnerabilities introduced by code modifications.

1. Introduction
2. Assessment summary
3. Scope
4. Findings overview

// Download the full report

Token

* Use Google Chrome for best results

** Check "Background Graphics" in the print settings if needed

← Back to Audits

Token - Dappos

Prepared by:

HALBORN

Last Updated 11/12/2025

Date of Engagement: November 5th, 2025 - November 5th, 2025

Summary

No Reported Findings to Address

All findings

Critical

High

Medium

Low

Informational

1. Introduction
2. Assessment summary
3. Scope
4. Findings overview

1. Introduction

The reviewed contracts contains the DAPPOS token implementation with LayerZero V2 cross-chain capabilities using the OFT (Omnichain Fungible Token) standard.

2. Assessment Summary

The objectives of this assessment were to:

Identify potential security vulnerabilities within the smart contracts.
Verify that the smart contract functionality operates as intended.

In summary, no issues were identified during the assessment of the DT codebase.

3. SCOPE

REPOSITORY

(a) Repository: DT

(b) Assessed Commit ID: 2600754

DapposToken.sol
DapposTokenAdapter.sol
DapposTokenOFT.sol

Out-of-Scope: Third-party dependencies and economic attacks.

Out-of-Scope: New features/implementations after the remediation commit IDs.

4. Findings Overview

Security analysis	Risk level	Remediation

Token

Dappos

Token - Dappos

Summary

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Assessment Summary

3. SCOPE

4. Findings Overview

Table of Contents

Token

Dappos

Token - Dappos

Summary

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Assessment Summary

3. SCOPE

4. Findings Overview

Table of Contents